It’s of more value in deeper contests like the NFBC, or in leagues with limited roster moves (draft and hold leagues, transaction limits/costs, extremely short benches, etc.), but even then the value is fairly situational and context-dependent. Positional eligibility, and specifically multi-eligibility, is really neat but also isn’t a huge factor in many 10- and 12-team leagues anymore due to the prevalence of multi-eligible players (16 of the 30 second baseman I ranked in the preseason were eligible at two positions, with five more players being eligible at three positions).I recommend trying as many of these things as you can until you find what you like. Unlike Nick, I’ll also look at other rankings as I prepare my own to get a feel for how my colleagues are valuing certain players, positions, or stats. I also use various projections (some free, some I buy) and dollar value generators. For ranking purposes, the primary starting points I use are plate discipline, wRC+, quality of contact metrics (also known as Statcast batted ball data), and lineup context. No stat is an island and they should all be taken in proper context.While we don’t have much for rolling data in 2022, you can see where they currently are on a rolling chart and see how it compares to their career trajectory. If I did want to get some insight on whether what I’m seeing is new or if it’s just normal fluctuation, I’d use my favorite tool-the rolling chart.It’s OK to be worried about slumping hitters like _, but don’t do anything rash.Finding steals at the end of the season can be a dogfight. Every steal is important, so don’t take those “chip-in” steals for granted. I’ve gotten more level-headed over the years when it comes to weighing stolen bases, but I still think they’re incredibly valuable given how rare they’re becoming.Feel free to let me know if I’m missing any!Īnd now a couple of notes on how I generally evaluate hitters before we dive in: This is just a maintenance thing and we will update eligibility throughout the season. I have not included presumed eligibilities based on likely new positions. I’m using 20 games as the threshold for the positional eligibility in the List.This is a safe space for me where I answer to no one but myself…and you if you leave a comment. That’s because these are only mine – no input from others. Yes, these ranks vary from the official PL positional rankings that I also developed in the offseason.I can’t possibly predict your team’s specific needs, your league mate’s player evaluations, or your current waiver wire, and if I could it’d be weird. Jon’s way of evaluating and ranking players has worked out well for Jon (and me) over the years, but it might not be a great fit for you. It’s why no two rankings are ever exactly alike. Every person’s rankings are influenced by their own biases, strategic philosophies, determinations of risk, and projections. I take rankings like this as more of an art than a science.If Player X is ranked at #55 and Player Y is ranked at #65, but they’re in the same tier, it means that I personally like Player X a lot better, but think there’s a valid argument to be made for Player Y performing just as well. Each tier represents a grouping of players that I think could arguably perform at a similar level, and/or carry similar levels of risk in terms of injury concerns or playing time obstacles. I would recommend not paying super close attention to the specific ranks of each player, and honing in more on the respective tiers that they’re in.They will only factor in the five standard categories: Runs, RBI, Home Runs, Batting Average, and Stolen Bases.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |